SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY ON THE GENDER OF GOD Term Paper

SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY ON THE GENDER OF GOD - Term Paper subject stock-still, most ethnologists have argued that divinity fudge has no grammatical gender especially the female theologians quoting the texts in genesis that states that at the beginning God created Man in his own build. In this condition, the image of God encompasses the features of both female and male and hence the conclusion that God has no gender. There are also other instances in which God is referred to as strong winds, tides, Waters Mountains and more other names thereby confirming that God is not a human being but a living spirit. The theology on the gender of God is therefore difficult to understand though there are several efforts from different religions to condone the understanding of Gods image with regard to respect to Gods gender.1 Among all these arguments, non has been adequate to(p) to prove that God is female or masculine since several texts referred to in the text are not only referring to speci fic situations, but are made to aid in the understanding of the words scriptures. For character when God is referred to as God the father, it was meant for the Christians to believe that God is the provider of hold dearion and security. When God is referred top as tides, mountains, waters and many other terms, it refers to power and a kind of supernatural being. This has therefore misled those who read the playscript since it has been interpreted the wrong way. This paper has therefore explored the different views from philosophers and theologizes with respect to Gods gender. All through the Christian bible, God is referred to as masculine. 2 This originated from the Greek word theos referring to God and most of the analogies have been employ to refer to God and almighty as Masculine. It is important to note that within the Christian doctrines, God had never been referred to as male or female. In fact within the Christian doctrines, God is referred to as the almighty. In this c ontext, God has no gender and represents the image of all of the human being creatures since he states in the loudness of genesis that he created human beings in his own image. However, the controversies come when Jesus is referred to as masculine. In the pertly Testament, Jesus is referred to as god and God is Jesus meaning they are one and the same thing. However Jesus in the New Testament is referred to as at the time of his birth as featherbed boy. Does this therefore mean that Jesus is a boy or a man pastime the several instances in which he is referred to with masculine notation. It is therefore important to note that there are differences in the midst of the new and the Old Testament with regard to the way Jesus gender is referred in many occasions. The promontory here is to determine whether Jesus and God are different or Jesus is God. However in the Old Testament, it has been stated that Jesus was to be born and that he was to be a boy. 3The relationship among Jesus and God is therefore not clear and hence there is lack of consistence among the Old Testament and the New Testament. While many Christian doctrines hold that god has no gender, many other religious leaders and Christians have argued that if this is the case then man was not created in the image of God or if man is created in the image of God then man in this context does not include women. In the view of the above, the ancient Greek fathers made a lot of efforts to protect